Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
Eleventh session New York, 7-18 May 2012
Agenda Item 4: Human
rights: (a) Implementation of the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Joint Statement of Grand
Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee), Assembly of First Nations, Canadian
Friends Service Committee (Quakers); Amnesty International, International
Indian Treaty Council, Africa Indigenous Peoples Climate Change Network, Union
of British Columbia Indian Chiefs (UBCIC), Chiefs of Ontario, Treaty Four First
Nations, Mainyoito Pastoralists Integrated Development Organization, First
Peoples Human Rights Coalition
Undermining
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and UN
Declaration: Urgent Need for Procedural Reforms in International
Organizations
As we
approach the five-year anniversary of the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, we join in its
celebration. During the past five
years, implementation of the Declaration has
taken place in diverse ways.
This
statement summarizes a larger Joint Submission (to be later emailed to the
PFII), which focuses on the challenges Indigenous peoples face in
ensuring implementation of the Declaration
at the international level.
Within international bodies and processes, consensus-driven
procedures are being exploited by States to the detriment of Indigenous
peoples. The lowest-common-denominator
among State positions often prevails. Such procedures are undermining the
principles of justice, democracy, non-discrimination, respect for human rights
and rule of law.
In his
March 2012 report on strengthening the rule of law nationally and
internationally, the UN Secretary-General affirms: "The rule of law is a
core principle of governance that ensures justice and fairness, values that are
essential to humanity."
This
report emphasizes: “The United Nations defines the rule of law as a principle
of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and
private, including the State itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly
promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international
human rights norms and standards."
Under existing procedures of international organizations, Indigenous
peoples have no effective means of safeguarding their human rights. When
Indigenous representatives raise concerns that State positions are inconsistent
with the Charter of the United Nations
and international human rights law, such concerns are generally not addressed
by the Parties.
The procedures within
international organizations require redress. The extent to which States are
prejudicing Indigenous peoples' human rights and disrespecting related State
obligations is critical. Indigenous concerns
relating to issues such as biodiversity, food security, climate change,
development, free trade and intellectual property, are being addressed to the
detriment of Indigenous peoples.
The rules of procedure in international organizations are generally
out-dated. The UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
highlights in its Final report of the
study on indigenous peoples and the right to participate in decision-making:
“Reform of international and regional processes involving indigenous peoples
should be a major priority and concern.”
The Expert Mechanism has done important work in this regard.
Similarly, Special Rapporteur on the rights of
indigenous peoples, James Anaya, has emphasized the need for reforms.
Indigenous
peoples' rights in the UN Declaration
were affirmed as "minimum standards for the survival, dignity and
well-being of the indigenous peoples of the world." [Article 43]. The Declaration calls on all states, the
United Nations, and its bodies and specialized agencies, to promote respect for
these minimum standards and their "full application." [Article 42.]
It is
unacceptable that procedural rules in international organizations, as well as
participating States, should be anything less than clear and explicit in
affirming the rule of law, consistent with international human rights standards
including the Declaration.
In this
context, it would be beneficial to examine the practices that governed the
negotiations on the UN Declaration.
An inclusive and democratic process of Indigenous participation was established
within the United Nations. It
still constitutes today an impressive precedent and best practice.
i) Undertake
on an urgent basis, an in-depth study of existing rules of procedure in diverse
international organizations that have real or potential impacts of major
consequence on Indigenous peoples' human rights and related interests. The
study should identify serious inadequacies and impacts affecting Indigenous
peoples, as well as propose effective remedies and possible compliance
mechanisms, with a view to ensuring fair and balanced procedural rules; and
ii) in
the Indigenous context, urge States to fully respect and implement, in
conjunction with Indigenous peoples, the rule of law at international and
national levels consistent with international human rights standards. Without limiting the foregoing, this
would necessarily include State obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and international human rights law,
including the UN Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
We also recommend that the
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues:
i) Review
the March 2012 Report of the UN Secretary-General entitled Delivering justice:
programme of action to strengthen the rule of law at the national and
international levels, with a view to proposing
timely revisions to the Report and ensuring that the challenges facing
Indigenous peoples are incorporated;
ii) participate
directly in the sixty-seventh session of the General Assembly at the high-level
meeting on the topic “The rule of law at the national and international
levels”; and
iii) include,
at the 2013 annual meeting of the Permanent Forum, under the agenda item of
"Human Rights: UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples", a
discussion on the "Need for urgent reforms in the procedural rules of
international organizations".